EstiWrightScenario

Scenario: value-engineering to hit a budget

The tender lands AED 180k over budget. Engineer it back down without gutting the margin.

The tender lands AED 180k over the client's budget — here's how to value-engineer it back under without surrendering the margin you priced in. Related demos: Scenario: pricing an ELV package for a tower and Scenario: repricing a mid-project variation.

Your low-voltage tender prices at AED 1.48M. The client's budget is AED 1.30M — you're AED 180k over, and the instinct is to cut margin to close the gap. Don't. Value engineering trims cost and scope, not the margin that keeps the job worth doing.

Where the gap is

Value
Tender as pricedAED 1.48M
Client budgetAED 1.30M
Gap to closeAED 180,000

Engineered options, each a real trade

Every option is a spec or scope change the client signs off — not a hidden dilution of quality.

OptionChangeSaving
Cameras4MP → 2MP in back-of-house onlyAED 42,000
NVR retention30-day → 14-day storageAED 28,000
PAVA zonesRe-scope to code minimumAED 55,000
CablingCat6A → Cat6 where standard permitsAED 38,000
Take-offWaste allowance 10% → 7%AED 22,000

Back under, margin intact

The five changes recover AED 185k — enough to clear the gap with a little headroom. Because every cut came from cost or scope, the blended margin holds at 22%, not the 14% it would have collapsed to if you'd simply discounted the number.

Cutting the price and value-engineering the price look identical on the bottom line and opposite on the P&L. One gives away your margin; the other gives the client a genuine choice.

Modelling VE options against a live BoQ, with margin visible throughout, is what EstiWright makes routine.

this is EstiWright

It's in the works.

EstiWright is in development — join the waitlist for early access.